Former Vice President Al Gore, speaking earlier this month in the U.K., revealed the intention behind global warming, global governance. As I have previously mentioned, global warming isn't an environmental concern, it is rather a tool. Though I haven't mentioned it prior, one of the reasons I have felt is behind the movement is a desire to utilize the global problem as a concept to push towards integrated global government. This is not much of a stretch when one compares the recent history of liberalism to the development of the European Union. Few focus on the fact that the E.U. was first conceptualized by the French as a means to tie Germany so integrally into the rest of Western Europe that it would never start another war (see footnote 4, "the problem of Germany". The recent history of American liberalism shows a similar thought process with its source being a hatred of America and it's supposed imperialistic tendencies. Though the French drew the U.S.A. into Vietnam, when they pulled out it became the Americans war and the fight against Communists in the North took on the appearance among liberals of America imposing its will upon an undeveloped country (never mind that Ho Chi Mihn slaughtered millions of Vietnamese after we pulled out as a result of largely liberal war policies with no goal, that's just what communist regimes do.) Further, the liberal conception of group rights (universal human rights, civil rights, universal health care) being superior to individual rights (the United States Bill of Rights, the English Magna Carta) is more amenable to socialist and communist ideologies, making America and its founding document and ideological enemy. The modern European liberal looks at America as a cultural and corporate imperialist. The French detest EuroDisney (though I honestly have to agree with them on this, they'd probably be more in favor of it if they new about Walt's communist leanings) and deplore that, not only are there McDonald's in Paris, but that they are doing well. They require a certain percentage of broadcasts to be made in the native French language rather than English language broadcasting. The French are just the best example of this. The turn of voters to xenophobic parties demonstrates the fear of a loss of culture coming to bear in most Western European democracies, though the more prevalent threat at the moment is immigration of largely Muslim peoples. Modern liberalism, therefore, sees America as a belligerent imperialist culture which must be stopped. The best way to reign in the U.S.A. is to tie them in to global governmental structures such as the U.N. and the IMF. The failure of these organizations to somehow reduce American wealth and independence necessitates the concept of this global disaster theology of climate change. If the world can convince Americans that the world is at threat, the global community can tie in America and regulate her industry through the concept of carbon emissions. It doesn't help that many of these liberals are so adamant about the theology that they truly believe their own line of crap.
Enter President Barack Obama and his willingness to tie America into these non-binding resolutions on climate change (see my earlier post "Your Friendly Neighborhood Weathermen"). Luckily, to this point they are only non-binding, but as can be seen from the comments of Al Gore, linked to above, the eventual goal is a global government structure with limited local sovereignty similar to the E.U. which, coincidentally, has been showing signs of rifts which might eventually lead to its collapse. As Americans, we certainly should be aware of and watchful for the motivations and tools of the modern liberalism in order to preserve our liberty. In theory, world peace is a wonderful idea, but at what cost? Do we abandon all freedom and individuality to subject ourselves to global goods in order to preserve peace, or do we die like Mel Gibson's William Wallace in "Braveheart", crying freedom.
No comments:
Post a Comment