Several of my more liberal friends have posted some nonsense on Facebook about one year of NPR funding being the equivalent of 42.7 minutes of funding for the Iraq war. Something that, as most liberal ideas are, is unreasearched crap that showed up on some asshole's Twitter account. I can't imagine how anyone would know given that the Democrats refused to pass a budget in the first place. Let me cover the research for people who don't care to look up facts. NPR received approximately
$5 million in federal funding last year. A pitance really. It's also only about 3% of the NPR operating budget of $145.5 million in budgeted revenues (this is according to an NPR source as reported by the AP if you can't bother checking the link).
The best I could find on Iraq war funding for 2010 is a reference to $50 billion, so we'll have to run with that (supposedly it's according to the New York Times, so...salt, lime, grimace). So, $5 million is to $50 billion .0001 %. So what's .0001% of a year? There are 525,600 minutes in a year. So, it appears closer to 52.5 minutes. Now I may be nitpicking, but there it is.
A few points:
1) Way to compare apples and dark matter;
2) If NPR is so damned cheap, why do I have to pay for you to use it? Shouldn't you be able to take care of that?;
3) NPR doesn't need the damned funding;
4) I own several CDs of "A Prarie Home Companion" and the government didn't buy them for me, nor did I expect it to;
5) I can at least make an argument that Iraq is within the constitutional powers of the government (though I believe the war to be unconstitutional) how bout NPR? Is it just me or would our founders find it disturbing that NPR gives one-sided editorial viewpoints (even if they were balanced, it's a problem) on government while taking government money to do so;
6) Just because you enjoy NPR is not reason enough to make it a government funded activity. If that were sufficient justification, we'd be running a deficit on teenagers masturbating that would have broken the government in the 1920s;
7) I'd gladly stop the war for an hour to make it an even cut;
8) I love that liberals expect me to be forced to give up the products of my labor so they can have easy access to entertainment and that it is the proper role of government to make me do so.
The idea posted misses the point of the debate entirely. NPR shouldn't be funded because the federal government doesn't have the power to do so. In that same vein, we should not be in Iraq without a Congressional declaration of war, or anywhere else for that matter.
This government will continue to spiral into debt and be a burden on the men and women of this country as long as we believe that we are entitled to some benefits from it or that it exists to nursemaid us. If you have a problem with defunding NPR, shut up and send a donation.
Come to think of it, I may post this on Facebook.